Back to assessments
Source assessmentCore

Guidelines on Assessment of AI Reliability in the Field of Plant Safety

AI reliability in plant safetyRegulatory/legal

Assessment outcome

total 5/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 1)

Total5/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

2/2

No rationale recorded.

By using the Guidelines, plant owner companies can achieve highly reliable AI and improve safety and productivity. It will also make it easier to be accountable internally and externally for the reliability of AI.

Authority

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Guidelines on Assessment of AI Reliability in the Field of Plant Safety Second Edition March 2021 the Liaison Council of Three Ministries on Disaster Prevention of Petroleum Complexes

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicAI reliability in plant safety
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Guidelines on Assessment of AI Reliability in the Field of Plant Safety · CEI AI Governance Database