Source assessmentSupporting
Robotic Speech Synthesis: Perspectives on Interactions, Scenarios, and Ethics
Robotic speech synthesis ethicsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Taking the backcha n- nel “really” as an example, it can be used for expressing inte rest, surprise, or disappointment, depending on its speaking sty le
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Yuanchao Li and Catherine Lai. 2022. Robotic Speech Synthesis: Persp ec- tives on Interactions, Scenarios, and Ethics. In HRI 2022 Workshop: Robo- Identity: Exploring Artificial Identity and Emotion via Spe ech Interactions
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicRobotic speech synthesis ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded